Genesis IV - Full Review

Yamikotai

Expert
Note: This review isn't 100% finished yet, but it's just some images and a burn test I need to add. However I finished the majority of the review over a week ago I figured I'd post it :)

Genesis IV Full Review
Hi, I’m Kieran Mitchell, and this my review of the Genesis IV 15.6” laptop from PC Specialist. These are the specifications:

Screen: 15.6" 1080p AUO 95% Gamut
CPU: Intel i7 3740QM @ 2.7GHz
RAM: 2x8GB 1600MHz (added myself)
GPU: Nvidia GT630M
SSD: 120GB OCZ Agility 3 (added myself)
HDD: 1TB WD Scorpio Blue
Battery: 2 x 62.16WH battery
Plus the 30-day pixel guarantee and Silver warranty.

Price for PCS model plus SSD+RAM: £920

First, I’d like to cover my experience with PC Specialist. The time between me ordering the laptop and it arriving on my doorstep was reasonable considering the time of year that I ordered it (lots of student loans coming in) – 14 days, or as it worked out, 9 working days. This is pretty much the standard estimated time for a custom system from them, so I was pleased with that. Support is good - replying to my inane questioning always within a day of asking - and even faster when I was asking more important things than technical details. The forums and its community are great – reasonably busy, with more than a few members dedicated to helping people out with tech issues or system configuration.

Being (mostly) a custom build service, PC Specialist (hereafter referred to as PCS) laptops don’t come installed with rubbish like office trials, anti-virus trials or your other usual shovelware. Not that this would have affected me anyway, since I opted for the ‘No Operating System’ route – one of the most appealing aspects of a PCS custom-build. As a power user, I’d never want to use an OS set up by someone else, though the particular allure of it not coming with an OS was the price saving – myself having collected various keys over the years from old systems, college and university – giving the Genesis IV a good price advantage compared to similar system right out of the door, even before you get to the hardware.

The Hardware
Before I continue, here’s the use case for the laptop – a rundown of my requirements. This laptop is mostly for work and academia - my university course is Ethical Hacking and Network Security, which requires a bit of a workhorse as I often need to run several VMs at once (a VM, or virtual machine, is basically running a virtual computer, on your computer; as you can guess, it takes a powerful machine to run more than one). This is on top of your usual word processing and media/internet consumption, and a bit of light gaming (Minecraft) on the side, since I have my desktop for the heavy games.

First up, the star of the show – the screen. I opted to spend the extra (£59) for the 1080p AUO 95% gamut LED. Suffice to say, it is magnificent. Colours are disturbingly accurate and vibrant. So far I’ve tested it by watching The Avengers from my Blu-Ray rip – keep in mind that this is a film I’ve watched a dozen times, and in some places it felt like I was watching a whole new film. Anywhere with even a subtle vibrancy of colour now looks spectacular, most notably the titular characters’ costumes – Iron Man’s suit looks fantastic, as do the iconic suit and shield of Captain America (the red ring around the shield particularly). And don’t get me started on Thor’s cape – I had no clue before how red it actually is. I don’t think I’ve ever seen something so red. And after saying that, I should point out that it doesn’t look over-saturated, just very (very) red. There were similar improvements in the recently-released remaster of Star Trek: The Next Generation. I also tried out Minecraft for a while, which looked noticeably nicer but didn’t show as much of a fundamental improvement as The Avengers and TNG did.

Overall, the screen is just wonderful – one of the requirements for my laptop this time round was at least a 1080p screen, after finding that the 1336x768 14” screen on my previous laptop rather sub-par for some tasks during my first year of university. This requirement was what ultimately led me to PCS, as they were one of the few companies I could find that would offer all of the specifications I wanted. The relatively resolution (1080p screen in a 15.6” format) makes all text and video look wonderfully sharp, allowing me to fit really quite a lot of work into a small space. When doing my research, I found some people complaining that they had to increase the DPI setting in Windows to use it comfortably, and in fact if you get the OS preinstalled by PCS they set it higher by default. Personally I find the default DPI perfectly usable and exactly what I’m after in a high-resolution screen. It’s especially nice for doing word processing on, as the fantastic whites make reading and writing in Word 2010 (which I’m writing this in) very easy on the eyes.

With a plentiful two paragraphs concerning the screen, I’ll move onto the touchpad. As touchpads go, it seems satisfactory – good features that work well, reasonable sensitivity, and left-right buttons with a decent click to them. Most of the issues I have with it currently will be irrelevant as I get used to them, such as the slightly different position (left-orientated compared to centre-orientated) and different touch-based shortcuts. I’m actually really pleased at some of those – I particularly like that all the shortcuts are editable. For example, by default a two-finger tap works as a middle-click (which I love), but it can be changed to a wide variety of other options, such as specific scrolling directions or zooming in/out. Another option I really like is that if I hold Shift, it greatly reduces the sensitivity for more accurate movement. While some of the defaults are useful, others aren’t quite as much, such as an upward three-finger swipe being ‘open My Computer’; personally I find it much easier just to press Windows+E. Still, I’m glad the option is there. The sensitivity of the pad is reasonable – I’m used to better (especially for when tapping to pad to left-click) but it’s just something I’ll need to get used to.

Now, I have one key issue with the touchpad, which is that occasionally – say, once or twice an hour – it will stop working. It only happens for 5-10 seconds when it does, which isn’t a huge problem, but is hugely inconvenient when it occurs. (Update: After using the Genesis IV for about 5 days now, this no longer happens. Either it was a minor issue that went away on its own, or I became accustomed to something that was causing it which I no longer do. Either way it’s fine now.)

On the other hand, the keyboard is flawless. I’ve intentionally written this review on it to get used to it, and I have to say I took to it rather quickly, except that I’m used to a smaller keyboard with no numpad. The keys are good, and spring back nicely. I’m used to a mechanical keyboard on my desktop and the Genesis IV’s keyboard doesn’t nearly match up of course, but it’s perfectly good for typing essays up on. Key spacing is good, and there’s no flexing of it or other areas of the laptop as a result of typing, which can be an issue with some laptops. It’s well-laid-out with a full-size British enter key, rather than the annoying thin US one, which is rather unsatisfying to use in comparison.
I went for the bottom-level option for WiFi (Intel N135), since I have some very good external antennae for any real WiFi use. Range is as good as any other built-in radio I’ve had on other laptops, and it being 802.11n meant I was able to download (using Rapidshare to ensure a saturated connection) at the full 4.2MB/s of my Virgin Media 30Mb connection with no issues.

To test the USB3 controller and ports, I used a Samsung M3 1TB external drive, and a Kingston DT Ultimate G2 16GB usb stick. I was able to reach both the maximum read and write speeds of both drives (90MB/s and 100MB/s, and 70MB/s and 60MB/s, respectively). There is one issue with the placement of the ports relative to the output vent, which I’ll get to later when I talk about the chassis.

The CPU – Intel i7-3740qm – handles everything I throw at it. Benchmarks for it can found at various places online so I won’t include them, but suffice to say it’s a beast.

Finally for the hardware I’ll talk about battery life. It’s okay. About what I’d expect. My previous laptop was Acer’s years-ago attempt at an ultrabook, and so had 7 hours battery life (but a 1.3GHZ dual-core Pentium). I knew not to expect great battery life on this, though I do think it could be better – keep in mind I have the Nvidia panel set to use the HD4000 integrated GPU for everything except for programs I specifically set to use the GT630m (so far, that’s only Minecraft). I did try for a while disabling one of the CPU cores to see if it made a difference – it didn’t really, and turned off HyperThreading so I now use it as it was intended. I ordered two of the higher-capacity 60something Wh batteries, though PCS sent me a standard 48WHr and 60something WHr battery in error, putting me in the fortunately unfortunate position of being able to test battery life with both (PCS sent out a replacement battery as soon as I contacted them). I end up getting about 2.5 to 3 hours on the weaker battery, and 3 to 3.5 hours on the better one.
 
Last edited:

Yamikotai

Expert
The Chassis
Overall, I like the chassis. It’s a reasonable-for the-size 2.3Kg. To put that in perspective, I’m reasonably comfortable carrying it with one hand while it’s open. I wanted a relatively light laptop for the specs and that’s what I got. I could’ve gone for an Optimus III (at the time) with a much better GPU for the same price, but since the weight of the Genesis IV is pretty much my ideal maximum weight for a laptop, I’m glad I did not.

Appearance-wise, it’s actually very nice. The lack of branding excluding the Nvidia Optimus + GT630m stickers is a breath of fresh air from previous laptops (both Acers), which had been adorned repeatedly with the company name. For something with a high-end Ivy Bridge i7, it’s rather thin, though it’s not exactly an ultrabook either. For an easy comparison, it’s about 1.5 times the height of an RJ45 (Ethernet) port at its thickest (not including the screen). The only negative I’ve found as far as appearance goes is the very (very) glossy exterior of the laptop attracts fingerprints like a fingerprint… magnetic… thing. To see what I mean by glossy, see this image:
http://gyazo.com/fe1c1289be210125c82b6594334c5445.png

The Genesis IV is easily the most solid laptop I’ve owned. The entire chassis is very solid – the only place I could get some slight bending is the underneath removable panel for getting at RAM/CPU/etc. Easily a 9/10 as far as the strength of the chassis goes. One issue I read on the forums was that the screen hinges on some of the other chassis caused the screen to wobble when typing. This emphatically doesn’t happen on the Genesis IV. A good test of the hinges is to stand the laptop on its screen, and see how far you can angle the ‘bottom’ of the laptop before gravity does its thing. As you can see here, the hinges are pretty good:
[image]

If there’s one issue with the chassis, it’s the position of the USB 3.0 ports on the right side relative to the position of the CPU+GPU exhaust vent. As you can see in the below image, they’re exceptionally close. While this is only an issue when you’re making use of the performance of your laptop, it does mean that whenever you are, it’s pumping heat at whatever devices you happen to have inserted. While it’s unlikely, this could cause issues with some cheaper devices not able to function in high operating temperatures. It also makes whatever device – in my usual case my Kingston USB3 stick – really hot when you go to remove it. Hot enough that it becomes uncomfortable to hold in your hands, though not hot enough to burn you or anything. There is an upside to the placement of the USB 3.0 ports, which is that they are quite far away from each other. It's all too common for them to be spaced uncomfortably together which makes plugging in multiple devices an issue (like on Macbooks) - I'm glad to say that this isn't an issue with the Genesis IV.

One final criticism I have is concerning the speakers. In short, they’re just not very good speakers and badly positioned at that. They’re placed here [link to image] sort-of-under the laptop, which usually means that unless you have solid unmalleable skin and clothes, they’re just firing most of the sound into your legs. I’m glad I didn’t get this to listen to music (I would use my earphones regardless), as I would be sorely disappointed.

The most notable feature of the Genesis IV, as it is with most Clevo chassis, is the fantastic user repairability. By this, I mean the ease by which any user can open and maintain/upgrade the chassis and its components. Just five screws on the bottom means you can open the bottom panel, giving you access to the RAM, CPU, GPU, wireless card, and so on. There’s plenty of room inside for easy meddling (I reckon that the chassis could’ve been slightly thinner – there’s a LOT of room inside). And thanks to the fantastic (digital) manual available, meddling is even easier, with there being instructions on everything from basic components to removing the keyboard and even the screen.

On the cooling side, the Genesis IV is really destined more as a basic home laptop chassis – expecting a lower-end CPU like a dual-core Ivy Bridge i3 than a top-end quad-core i7 – however, cooling is still adequate. While on other laptops from PCS you have the option between standard thermal paste and the better Arctic Cooling MX-4, there is no such option on the Genesis IV. I’m assuming it comes with the standard thermal paste, but for optimal cooling I replaced the thermal paste with Arctic Cooling MX-4 of my own, taking care to measure minimum and maximum temperatures with both thermal pastes in use.

For measuring temperatures, I have used Hardware Monitor – a program I’ve used for many years. To achieve maximum temperatures, I am using Intel Burn Test on High for 20 passes. Intel Burn Test hits every part of the CPU with 100% load for as long as the test runs. Keep in mind that the temperatures incited by this test do not represent the maximum temperatures that anyone would come across in normal use, as there are no real-world uses that can put this much load on a CPU. All tests done with the laptop on High Performance power plan in both the Windows settings (and the ‘Control Centre’, a utility for toggling laptop hardware).
[image: burn test with standard TIM]
[image: burn test with MX-4]
(I'll be adding these in due time)

Conclusion
In conclusion, I’m quite happy with my purchase. The Genesis IV offers me much better specs at an £800 price level than even Tier 1 companies (dell, HP, Lenovo etc.) can offer me – especially as far as screen quality/resolution and maximum RAM capacity go. And PCS even offers better support, despite being miniscule in comparison.

I’m not really accustomed to giving products scores out of ten or one hundred, but I were to do so I imagine somewhere between 75/100 and 90/100.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PCS

PCS

Administrator
Staff member
Thanks for your in-depth feedback :)

As soon as you add some image we'll add your review to the configurator section on our website.
 
Top