SpyderTracks
We love you Ukraine
Well worth a look
Yeah, I paid no attention to that, apologies, should have mentioned thatAnother anti-AIO vid from Linus using a bench to do all the testing I don't think he's against it, per say, I believe he may be in the pocket of others.
Really frustrating IMO as it's just plain wrong. 99% of users will be in a case where the AIO makes all the sense in the world. An air cooler will typically perform better than an AIO due to how it works, in an open bench, when the radiator surface area is the same. This isn't news and isn't an argument that needs made.
I would have far more respect if he actually did the tests in a typical case (or a few different options) to show where an AIO is a must vs where it makes minimal improvements (Good airflow cases).
It's definitely a step in the right direction, but it's the initial cost until it hits more widespread adoption, this is still gonna be very niche and as such, extremely expensive unfortunately as with any new technology.What I think is interesting is the technology here. The IceGiant cooler is sort of halfway between an air cooler and a liquid cooler: kind of like heat pipes on steroids with a separate radiator.
What's also interesting is the fact that, while AIOs clearly do have an advantage, it's not an enormous one. They're right up against the thermal limits. And it isn't going to be long before the top-end chips are not capable of running at full capacity without throttling, even with the best coolers. That's a pretty ridiculous situation to be in. I'm really interested to see how both the CPU and cooling industries handle this in the next few years.
(I'll admit I'm a fan of air-cooling, but that's partly on aesthetic grounds, and also on the grounds of liking to be able to fix anything that goes wrong with my cooler.)
Yeah, absolutely. The interesting thing is that efficiency is being achieved with modern technology. Look, for example, at the data centre industry, where ARM is taking off because it's efficient, and efficiency means money saved. It's in the smaller scale, and especially in gaming, where absolute upper-edge performance is most valued that the technology is getting stupid. (Because most gamers/small-scale content creators don't know or don't care about the energy costs, I guess.)It's definitely a step in the right direction, but it's the initial cost until it hits more widespread adoption, this is still gonna be very niche and as such, extremely expensive unfortunately as with any new technology.
If they can get this performance as with this new BETA version into mass adoption, then we've got no moving parts, so failure links are minimised, hopefully much lower cost in the longer term as well.
I just don't see how CPU and GPU manufacturers can keep pushing the power boundary as they currently are. I personally think that governments will step in.
If you look at the current heat wave across all of Europe, this is unfortunately going to be very much the norm and in fact it will be far worse than this if we collectively (at a governmental legislative level) don't step in and mandate some ceilings for businesses and products to adhere to, with pretty steep penalties incurred should those limits be breached.
I was out flying my drone the other day, and it was getting a bit warm, so I just bought the drone to a hover at about 8 feet and went and stood under it, beautiful cool draught....Or attach a household water inlet to the liquid intake, and the output to the boiler - would have cold water coming in to cool the PC and warm water going out to warm the house in winter?
(they don't call me 'Blue Sky Tony' for nothing)