Samsung's 57-inch Odyssey Neo G9 DUHD Gaming Monitor U.S. Preorders Open
The 57-inch Odyssey Neo G9 has a 240Hz refresh rate and a 7680 x 2160 resolution.
Oh my….
Samsung Odyssey G9 DUHD
- Thread starter steaky360
- Start date
Oh my….
SpyderTracks
We love you Ukraine
insane isn't it! Mind boggling. This is the kind of screen that would take 10 years until you could get decent performance on it.Samsung's 57-inch Odyssey Neo G9 DUHD Gaming Monitor U.S. Preorders Open
The 57-inch Odyssey Neo G9 has a 240Hz refresh rate and a 7680 x 2160 resolution.www.tomshardware.com
Oh my….
If they release the same but OLED, think that would be the absolute pinnacle.
Woah!!
Completely agree, if that was OLED I don't think anything could touch it. I would like to see the performance on it though. Being sensible with the settings and all the DLSS trickery etc, I don't think it would be a bad experience at all, but 240hz? Who are they kidding?
I just don't get the point in the 240hz on this style of panel (well any, but this seems like a waste of important resource to me). I get they need those numbers on the box to sell things, but I really wish they didn't have to. 144hz & OLED on that would be significantly more beneficial.
Completely agree, if that was OLED I don't think anything could touch it. I would like to see the performance on it though. Being sensible with the settings and all the DLSS trickery etc, I don't think it would be a bad experience at all, but 240hz? Who are they kidding?
I just don't get the point in the 240hz on this style of panel (well any, but this seems like a waste of important resource to me). I get they need those numbers on the box to sell things, but I really wish they didn't have to. 144hz & OLED on that would be significantly more beneficial.
SpyderTracks
We love you Ukraine
I have wondered why they put 240hz on all the G9 panels, it does seem extremely unnecessary for the aspect ratio, it's not as if any competitive player would ever go for a superwide.
I wonder if it some odd requirement for these panels or something, just seems odd that they'd put in quite an umeccesary and expensive feature.
If they were 144Hz it wouldn't be a detriment in any way at all.
I expect (as is potentially obvious) the costs associated with pushing the refresh rate in terms of production are outweighed by the increased sales they'll see due to the 'numbers being bigger'..
I know I for one, like my numbers to be bigger!
HomerJ
Author Level
GeForce RTX 4090 limited to 120Hz on Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 dual 4K 240Hz monitor - VideoCardz.com
Only Radeon RX 7000 can support 7680×2160/240Hz output on Odyssey Neo G9 A review from South Korean’s QuasarZone media channel highlights that Samsung’s upcoming ultra-wide Odyssey G9 Neo monitor finds its full compatibility exclusively with Radeon RX 7000 GPUs. The Odyssey G9 Neo, a flagship...
videocardz.com
GeForce RTX 4090 limited to 120Hz on Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 dual 4K 240Hz monitor - VideoCardz.com
Only Radeon RX 7000 can support 7680×2160/240Hz output on Odyssey Neo G9 A review from South Korean’s QuasarZone media channel highlights that Samsung’s upcoming ultra-wide Odyssey G9 Neo monitor finds its full compatibility exclusively with Radeon RX 7000 GPUs. The Odyssey G9 Neo, a flagship...
Not surprising from Nvidia tbh. I didn't even realise they didn't opt for the latest standard, but it doesn't surprise me.
It's a bit of a kick for no reason though. A bit like saying my car doesn't have the necessary hardware for deep sea exploration, even if it did...... it wouldn't be doing it.