Benchmark Results Leaderboard

debiruman665

debiruman665

Enthusiast
Here's my best firestrike score,

SCORE 21401 with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Notebook)(1x) and Intel Core i9-9900K

www.3dmark.com

I scored 21 401 in Fire Strike

Intel Core i9-9900K Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Notebook) x 1, 16384 MB, 64-bit Windows 10}
www.3dmark.com www.3dmark.com

was using the obsidian settings If I remember correctly


The_Scotster said:
Desktop - https://www.3dmark.com/fs/17863212 - Firestrike - RTX2080 & 9900K - 27353
Laptop - https://www.pcspecialist.co.uk/forums/attachments/final-oc-png.8815/ - Firestrike - GTX1080 Notebook & 6700k - 17836

Couldn't find the link for my laptop run, wasn't yesterday. Both systems OC'd and pushed a wee bit.
Click to expand...

5.4Ghz

holy macaroni
 
R

robertmcgregor563

New member
Hi there,

Just set up and tested my new Defiance V RTX laptop...

13444


My Fire Strike score is 15140.

I think I might be quite high on the leaderboard!

Cheers all,

Rob.

Gibbs said:
Just for fun, post your 3DMark scores here. Please also include the online results page so we can see your spec and drool. or laugh.

For 3DMark, download here:
http://www.futuremark.com/benchmarks/3dmark
Please run the Firestrike test and post the results page link. It has GPU, CPU and combined score so it should give everyone a better idea of performance.

Here are the PC leaderboards:

3DMark
1. halox 18621 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/7422914
2. Steaky360 15304 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/479171
3. Gazza 13669 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/917333
4. Bsrz 13018 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/774897
5. Numpty 12752 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1120610
6. Rustilol 12646 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/2222445
7. Jaystar 11249 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/1767452
8. halox 11067 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1249675
9. Tom DWC 10996 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/489705
10. TheGeeza 10803 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2501680

====================================================================================
Here are the LAPTOP leaderboards:
3DMark

1. Stormbrook Omega II 8390 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1695436
2. Punchuk 5202 Vortex III http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2589818
3. zulubear 5186 Vortex IV http://www.3dmark.com/fs/659694
4. malgall 5139 Vortex IV http://www.3dmark.com/fs/1193625
5. driedeker 5134 Vortex IV http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1714610
6. M3zxu 5091 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/294071
7. Thorthor 4866 Vortex IV http://www.3dmark.com/fs/1262196
8. andjon838 4753 Vortex III http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/918671
9. Cricky 4751 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1992419
10. keynes 4725 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/547507
10= jacktimson 4725 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/982095
Click to expand...
 
B

Bukky

Member
Well, the 3900 isn't a gaming chip... Still, it seems kinda low for your laptop (even though those benchmarks measure very different things, your laptop managed to get awesome/insane cinebench results)
 
J

JosDea

Active member
Bukky said:
Well, the 3900 isn't a gaming chip... Still, it seems kinda low for your laptop (even though those benchmarks measure very different things, your laptop managed to get awesome/insane cinebench results)
Click to expand...

Done research and apparently it's because they never bothered to optimise that test for AMD.

The rationale being " it's a realistic representation of the architecture differences"

Which I kinda get, some software you use might be old and unoptimised fair enough.

But bench marks are to compare in an apples to apples way so it's kinda BS from 3d mark as it gives intel a unfair advantage in this case.

My individual physics score and graphics score are around the 20k mark so it's very confusing.
 
FerrariVie

FerrariVie

Super Star
scarpa1 said:
This is mine, new PC so all settings, everything the same as when PCS sent it out.

This is very new to me testing stuff so no idea on the results.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/54032651?
Click to expand...
While those scores look amazing to me, 3Dmark seems to say that most people with similar specs to yours usually get between 32200 and 36799. So there might be a bit of performance yet to be squeezed out of your machine, but I cannot tell exactly where. I would guess on the memory speeds? You should have chosen something faster (at least 3200), or maybe you have a background app that's using some resources.
1606862869247.png
 
Scott

Scott

Behold The Ford Mondeo
Moderator
I don't think the memory is configured right, could be wrong though. My guess is it's at least 3200Mhz. I would hope so at least. That's a serious bottleneck if it's legit.
 
S

scarpa1

Enthusiast
Scott said:
I don't think the memory is configured right, could be wrong though. My guess is it's at least 3200Mhz. I would hope so at least. That's a serious bottleneck if it's legit.
Click to expand...
Its 4 8gb 3600mhz
Like I said its just how PCS left it, I haven't been through everything yet.
Any advice to configure the memory better?
 
Scott

Scott

Behold The Ford Mondeo
Moderator
You will need to set the profile in the BIOS. If you are comfortable going into the BIOS you may see it, but if not we can talk you through it. Hopefully it'll be under an XMP profile.
 
S

scarpa1

Enthusiast
Scott said:
You will need to set the profile in the BIOS. If you are comfortable going into the BIOS you may see it, but if not we can talk you through it. Hopefully it'll be under an XMP profile.
Click to expand...
The memory is indeed running at 2133mhz when I check on the task manager, performance.
I had a look in bios last night and everything seems like it should be running correctly, AI overclock tuner is set to d.o.c.p and the correct ram speed is set 3600mhz.
I googled a few vids on this last night and they say to get ram running at right speeds to set the d.o.c.p on but mine already seems like it is.
Its a x570 f asus strix motherboard
4x 8gb 3600mhz memory corsair vengeance
 
Last edited:
FerrariVie

FerrariVie

Super Star
scarpa1 said:
Update on the above.
I went into bios and lowered the speed to 3200, saved and restarted and the memory was running at 3200, went back to bios and kept putting the speed up until i reached 3600, restarted and its running at 3600hmz now.

Ran the firestrike again and results below.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/54074046?
Click to expand...
Now that's what I wanted to see! Great that you figured that out and ended up with an even faster machine. Congratulations, that is a hell of a score (y)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top