adskankster
Member
Hi All,
I'm looking to get a new gaming PC & monitor with a combined budget of about £1600 (can't go much above that really). I have some cheap keyboards/mice I can use for a stop-gap, and I have a wired port, to don't need wifi. Bluetooth is a nice to have, but not a necessity.
I'm coming over from PS4, partly because of the inability to get a PS5 (not only reason), so I'd like a reasonably short wait time - which is obviously an issue at the moment.
I'm probably going vary the games a lot, but one game I'll be playing, at least initially, is No Man's Sky, and I'd prefer to play it on Ultra, if I can. So that's a preferred minimum spec. I think this is quite CPU demanding, so I'd like a reasonably beefy CPU. I may be able to compromise on it, but I don't really want to have to upgrade it for a while, if I can help it.
I want a monitor that's 1440p but it looks like the graphics cards that support that are long wait times? I'd rather get a system soon, so am happy to compromise a bit to start with. So would it be worth while to get a graphics card that doesn't support it, to work with a monitor that does - but can run at 1080p (is that possible?).
I'm happy to upgrade over time (obviously) but probably won't be able to spend more than a couple of hundred over time, and I'd like to get as much life as possible out of what I can get now.
If the budget just isn't up to it now, I'm probaly looking for something that's available/usable now, but with the smoothest upgrade path over the next year or two, when supply issues start to settle down.
Any advice is much appreciated.
Many thanks.
I'm looking to get a new gaming PC & monitor with a combined budget of about £1600 (can't go much above that really). I have some cheap keyboards/mice I can use for a stop-gap, and I have a wired port, to don't need wifi. Bluetooth is a nice to have, but not a necessity.
I'm coming over from PS4, partly because of the inability to get a PS5 (not only reason), so I'd like a reasonably short wait time - which is obviously an issue at the moment.
I'm probably going vary the games a lot, but one game I'll be playing, at least initially, is No Man's Sky, and I'd prefer to play it on Ultra, if I can. So that's a preferred minimum spec. I think this is quite CPU demanding, so I'd like a reasonably beefy CPU. I may be able to compromise on it, but I don't really want to have to upgrade it for a while, if I can help it.
I want a monitor that's 1440p but it looks like the graphics cards that support that are long wait times? I'd rather get a system soon, so am happy to compromise a bit to start with. So would it be worth while to get a graphics card that doesn't support it, to work with a monitor that does - but can run at 1080p (is that possible?).
I'm happy to upgrade over time (obviously) but probably won't be able to spend more than a couple of hundred over time, and I'd like to get as much life as possible out of what I can get now.
If the budget just isn't up to it now, I'm probaly looking for something that's available/usable now, but with the smoothest upgrade path over the next year or two, when supply issues start to settle down.
Any advice is much appreciated.
Many thanks.