Lemon_Haze
Gold Level Poster
there still might be hope seen on few models, that undervolt applied in bios for 10th gen. not all of them but few already has been possible to adjust voltageVery disappointing that we can't throttlestop it.
there still might be hope seen on few models, that undervolt applied in bios for 10th gen. not all of them but few already has been possible to adjust voltageVery disappointing that we can't throttlestop it.
You've overvolted rather than undervolted.I just tried -1 under-volt on my Vyper 17 and it worst ... now in load goes up 95-97 and in idle 60-66...
Is fast and good quality but the thermals are very high ! sky is the limit.
You've overvolted rather than undervolted.
If temps are going up when applying the undervolt, it suggests it's actually applying an overvolt. Try entering a value the other way and see how temps respond. With an undervolt, each increment should further reduce temps.I have found a guide online for exactly the same laptop but under a different name .. and they did a under-volt of 0.15 V.
On Vyper 17 Bios, i have changed the value to negative and then inserted 1.
Isnt this the correct way ?
Mine is idleling at 50 and on load 5 our of 8 cores are over 92...
If temps are going up when applying the undervolt, it suggests it's actually applying an overvolt. Try entering a value the other way and see how temps respond. With an undervolt, each increment should further reduce temps.
BTW, with undervolting or overclocking or anything like that, what someone else has achieved has no relevance to what you may achieve. It's called silicon lottery, every chip is different in it's electrical properties. Some will go miles, some won't go at all. So you always have to start low, maybe -0.50, then work down in -0.1 increments until you hit instability, then dial back and do stress tests until you're sure it's stable.
We really need this confirmed by PCS, if it's only accepting integers, then we need to understand exactly what that translates to.... I will send the admins an email to see if we can get some further clarification and get back to you once I hear something.But you cant enter 0. values ... it accepts only integer values.
let me take a pic
We really need this confirmed by PCS, if it's only accepting integers, then we need to understand exactly what that translates to.... I will send the admins an email to see if we can get some further clarification and get back to you once I hear something.
It may be worth one of you phoning PCS if you get a moment to discuss it with them also, may get an answer sooner
Furthermore, until we get some clarification on this, I would suggest not playing with the setting just in case it's doing something completely unexpected, and if it's affecting temps negatively (ie pushing them up) then obviously that's something we need to avoid.
Give me until tomorrow probably and I'll come back to you with an answer if someone hasn't found out in the meantime.
Going by the pictures, it's in mV already so you'd increment by values of -10 which is 0.10VI did revert back ... to 0 as in the pics above. Thank you !
Some explanations on this are here, from page 3 --> https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1912/1912.04870.pdf
I did some searching and yeah you are right, we should not touch that until PCS confirms..
No, normally you’d be looking more like -100mv.-50 wouldn't be that much of an undervolt would it?
Personally I wouldn't undervolt with those temps. Glad it's now sorted.I needed to return my laptop - PCS confirmed that the thermal paste was not applied or not applied correctly ... Now the laptop is staying at 35-45 in idle, 50-55 in office mode for normal apps and browsing and 75-82 while gaming.
PCS are still exploring the possibilities of an under-volt, but nothing yet on how to do it.
Is the best laptop i ever had ...
Personally I wouldn't undervolt with those temps. Glad it's now sorted.
Maybe you can help .. i dont know so much about this... When i use HwInfo i can see the PL1 and PL2 set to 100W, but i see others with the same spec on Vyper 17 with PL1 and PL2 set on 120W. Is this a problem ..?
Thank you,
George
If temps are going up when applying the undervolt, it suggests it's actually applying an overvolt. Try entering a value the other way and see how temps respond. With an undervolt, each increment should further reduce temps.
BTW, with undervolting or overclocking or anything like that, what someone else has achieved has no relevance to what you may achieve. It's called silicon lottery, every chip is different in it's electrical properties. Some will go miles, some won't go at all. So you always have to start low, maybe -0.50, then work down in -0.1 increments until you hit instability, then dial back and do stress tests until you're sure it's stable.
It's possible If there is still head room for more Hz that was previously not being attained because of thermal throttling then any extra reduction in temps will be eaten up by the more cycles and the temp will have virtually not changed at all.