How can I prove that?
You don't need to. If nothing has been done for overclocking there won't be evidence in the BIOS of overclocking.
How can I prove that?
Sorry, it's just that I'm very cynical...and a new poster, posting on a 3 year old thread, in a PCSpecialist customer-centric forum, and linking to a low-traffic 'Indian Times' style website/blog set my Spidey-senses tinglingMan, it's my real concern. I noticed this post today morning. I keep reading a lot about overclocking. This was my second post here, how can it be a spam? I just want to be sure I will not be left with a problem like this.
Have you overclocked? If not, there's no concern.Man, it's my real concern. I noticed this post today morning. I keep reading a lot about overclocking. This was my second post here, how can it be a spam? I just want to be sure I will not be left with a problem like this.
My current computer cannot be overclocked, but I am thinking about buying a PC based on Intel series K CPU. When I saw that article today morning, I immediately thought about a few things:Have you overclocked? If not, there's no concern.
PCS don't supply used components, only new. Any returned parts under warranty would be exchanged for a new part- what if I get a CPU which has been returned by someone who damaged it (but not fully so it still works but crashes randomly as described in that article)?
Returned parts are faulty, so they're replaced with a new part.- how do you guys check the parts that are returned to you in order to avoid such scenario?
If the overclock was out of the bounds that PCS had applied and damage resulted, then the onus would be on you. If the damage had occured while under the overclock they'd applied during build, then it would be covered by warranty.- I would also like to test waters with overclocking, how will I be able to prove that it wasn't me who damaged the CPU? Will I need to run stress test BEFORE I do overclocking, to know that I got a good CPU?
All parts have serial numbers, so they know exactly which parts should be in your build.- If somebody damaged a CPU in this way, but then reset BIOS or something like that (they could even use the CPU in a different motherboard) and then returned it, how will you know?
The easy answer is, there's no benefit these days to overclocking the CPU outside of very niche usecases. CPU's are not like they used to be, they auto overclock extremely efficiently, outside of extreme rendering jobs lasting several days of continuous load, you're not going to really get much benefit from a CPU overclock.- even if I can prove a damaged CPU was delivered to me, returning the whole computer is a hassle, then proving it wasn't me (especially if I also want to try overclocking and are buying an overclockable computer).
Is this a PCSpecialist PC you're thinking of buying? If so, what specifically is driving the need to 'get into overclocking'?My current computer cannot be overclocked, but I am thinking about buying a PC based on Intel series K CPU. When I saw that article today morning, I immediately thought about a few things:
- what if I get a CPU which has been returned by someone who damaged it (but not fully so it still works but crashes randomly as described in that article)?
- how do you guys check the parts that are returned to you in order to avoid such scenario?
- I would also like to test waters with overclocking, how will I be able to prove that it wasn't me who damaged the CPU? Will I need to run stress test BEFORE I do overclocking, to know that I got a good CPU?
- If somebody damaged a CPU in this way, but then reset BIOS or something like that (they could even use the CPU in a different motherboard) and then returned it, how will you know?
- even if I can prove a damaged CPU was delivered to me, returning the whole computer is a hassle, then proving it wasn't me (especially if I also want to try overclocking and are buying an overclockable computer).
I wish a CPU either worked or not, without this intermediate state which is described in this article. The life would be much easier.
Is it ASUS Maximus Dark Hero or Gigabyte AORUS Master?there's only one Mobo that PCS supply that's really designed for "proper" overclocking.
We can't advise on individual components as the whole system has to relate.Is it ASUS Maximus Dark Hero or Gigabyte AORUS Master?
I hope the answer is not that it is Gigabyte only because ASUS Dark Hero is not currently in stock. If both were is stock, which one would be better for overclocking?