Windows 11

Scott

Behold The Ford Mondeo
Moderator
According to the ASUS website my Motherboard is compatible with Windows 11.
You're going around in circles unfortunately. It's a ploy on terminology. Technically it is compatible with Windows 11. The issue is that the processor isn't. In order to get a processor shoehorned into the Motherboard takes a lot of BIOS fettling.
 

B4zookaw

VALUED CONTRIBUTOR
Yeah but Windows 10 won't be supported after the Autumn of 2025 and therefore a security risk. That's what scares me the most. I don't want my bank details etc wide open like they would be without security.
By the time 2025 comes around, you'll be looking to replace your current build if you want to be playing modern games at a decent performance level anyway.
 

ubuysa

The BSOD Doctor
I suspect by the time Windows 10 support is due to stop Microsoft will relax the hardware requirements for Windows 11.

There are ways to install it on older systems but not really recommended for a main home computer, and as others have said, not much point. My experience with Windows 11 so far has been to try and make it work like Windows 10 did. Some aspects of it are infuriating, not being able to uncombine the task bar being the worst level of stupidity I've encountered, makes using Windows so unproductive.
I'm afraid I have to disagree with this view. Windows 11 is not just a fancy Windows 10, and it's not supported on pre-8th gen CPUs just because Microsoft want people to upgrade.

Windows 11 was developed because the CPU vendors (Intel and AMD) were producing CPUs with improved hardware security built in to the chips, and Microsoft wanted to take advantage of those hardware features to improve the security within Windows. This left Microsoft with a dilemma, had they simply upgraded Windows 10 to use these new features, then something like 70% of all Windows 10 based PCs , with CPUs that did not contain the newer security features, would have stopped working!

Microsoft thus decided (rightly IMO) to introduce WIndows 11, which did require a CPU with the newer security features (8th gen or later), and which would not be supported on earlier CPUs. For all those of us running earlier CPUs, Microsoft pledged to support Windows 10 until 2025, which is long enough for everyone to upgrade should they chose to.

It IS possible to install and run Windows 11 on CPUs earlier than 8th gen. I've had it running on my 6th gen CPU for example. The problem with this, apart from the fact that not all Windows 11 security features are active, is that some of the main security features (HVCI for example) have to be emulated in Windows 11 (because the older CPU doesn't have the required hardware). This emulation causes a noticeable performance hit, so gamers in particular will not be happy.

The bottom line is that Microsoft are unlikely in the extreme to ever support Windows 11 on early CPUs, because it was designed specifically for CPUs with the newer hardware features. We all know how foolish it is to run with an unsupported OS.
 

SpyderTracks

We love you Ukraine
I'm afraid I have to disagree with this view. Windows 11 is not just a fancy Windows 10, and it's not supported on pre-8th gen CPUs just because Microsoft want people to upgrade.

Windows 11 was developed because the CPU vendors (Intel and AMD) were producing CPUs with improved hardware security built in to the chips, and Microsoft wanted to take advantage of those hardware features to improve the security within Windows. This left Microsoft with a dilemma, had they simply upgraded Windows 10 to use these new features, then something like 70% of all Windows 10 based PCs , with CPUs that did not contain the newer security features, would have stopped working!

Microsoft thus decided (rightly IMO) to introduce WIndows 11, which did require a CPU with the newer security features (8th gen or later), and which would not be supported on earlier CPUs. For all those of us running earlier CPUs, Microsoft pledged to support Windows 10 until 2025, which is long enough for everyone to upgrade should they chose to.

It IS possible to install and run Windows 11 on CPUs earlier than 8th gen. I've had it running on my 6th gen CPU for example. The problem with this, apart from the fact that not all Windows 11 security features are active, is that some of the main security features (HVCI for example) have to be emulated in Windows 11 (because the older CPU doesn't have the required hardware). This emulation causes a noticeable performance hit, so gamers in particular will not be happy.

The bottom line is that Microsoft are unlikely in the extreme to ever support Windows 11 on early CPUs, because it was designed specifically for CPUs with the newer hardware features. We all know how foolish it is to run with an unsupported OS.
Further to this, 2025 when windows 10 expires aligns with almost every major hardware manufacturer stopping support for any devices without a TPM.

You'll notice that windows 11 systems invariably ask you to use some form of windows hello sign in, often biometric.

Biometrics cannot work without a TPM

My guess is the major providers will be doing away with password access around 2025 and biometrics will become the norm.

This has been a major point of contention in IT for at least 15 years, with the success of 2fa, it's now wholly viable
 
Last edited:

SpyderTracks

We love you Ukraine
I hope not as things like face recognition and finger prints is so unreliable
They've got 2 years to perfect it.

It's night and day on an apple device, extremely reliable, we just need the others to catch up.

But I wouldn't be surprised given the importance as of how easy it is to hack a password these days if they create an open standard for readers so that everyone is basing it off a basic requirement that standard amongst all manufacturers.

That's my hope anyway
 

Martinr36

MOST VALUED CONTRIBUTOR
They've got 2 years to perfect it.

It's night and day on an apple device, extremely reliable, we just need the others to catch up.

But I wouldn't be surprised given the importance as of how easy it is to hack a password these days if they create an open standard for readers so that everyone is basing it off a basic requirement that standard amongst all manufacturers.

That's my hope anyway
Finger print used to work well on both my LG V50 and fold Z2, then i started work at Tesco and opening store ready display cardboard boxes has obviously affected my fingerprints and now neither device reads them unless I delete and redo them regularly, as for face recognition on my tab 7fe, I don't think that's ever really worked,so i use my pin all the time now
 

SpyderTracks

We love you Ukraine
Finger print used to work well on both my LG V50 and fold Z2, then i started work at Tesco and opening store ready display cardboard boxes has obviously affected my fingerprints and now neither device reads them unless I delete and redo them regularly, as for face recognition on my tab 7fe, I don't think that's ever really worked,so i use my pin all the time now
My Samsung Android sucks at both fingerprint and face, I don't bother with it. It's an android thing though, any apple device is miles ahead, especially with FaceID
 

Martinr36

MOST VALUED CONTRIBUTOR
any apple device is miles ahead, especially with FaceID
I'd never have one.........lol

Just looked at face sign in on laptop, and get the message as below

1674656245737.png
 
Last edited:

sck451

MOST VALUED CONTRIBUTOR
My Samsung Android sucks at both fingerprint and face, I don't bother with it. It's an android thing though, any apple device is miles ahead, especially with FaceID
My Pixel 6 is superb at both. Not quite as good as the Pixel 3 was (RIP) but it's still first time 90+% of the time.
 

Scott

Behold The Ford Mondeo
Moderator
S20+ is fantastic with the fingerprint (and onwards). I had the S9 that was decent too, but the S7 wasn't too hot. Windows Hello facial recognition works great for me in good light, not ideal though. Fingerprint readers on laptops have always been hit or miss for me.

I've got an iPhone for work and the sensor on it is really good as well.

Wouldn't be at all surprised if biometrics become the preferred option, it already is with Windows IMO as it pushes you towards it if you have the appropriate hardware.
 

TonyCarter

VALUED CONTRIBUTOR
I wonder whether the new 'hardware tokens' that Apple and Microsoft are enabled will allow one to use the Face-ID or Touch-ID on an Apple device to authenticate a Windows device?

I already use Face-ID on my iPhone to log-on to my Virgin Media account (on my Mac), and into our work's VPN on their laptop.
 

SpyderTracks

We love you Ukraine
I've got a PCSpecialist agent looking in to it for me and hopefully be able to tell me what needs doing to be able to run win 11.
You'd need to replace it as the motherboard can't support a CPU upgrade which I'd required for windows 11

I have a feeling this is falling in deaf ears though as we've said the same thing 4 times or so
 
Top